Author: cutterjohn
Subject: X370 Fatal1ty Gaming Professional - [BIOS v2.x]
Posted: 20 May 2017 at 8:48am
You're right something is NOT RIGHT with 2.30 BIOS. I just got a WHEA w/a NOT VERY DEMANDING GAME AND I have noticed in hwinfo 551 latest beta inexplicable temperature spikes on the CPU which I'm going to guess are related to the WHEA.
I'm REALLY REGRETTING NOT waiting for a C6H as VRMs aren't a thing so much for Ryzen... and... I'm regretting NOT waiting for naple/'epyc' since I'm going there anyways given the craptacular low-mid range I/O... yeah SOME people MIGHT be OK w/the low-mid range chipsets, but TBH it's less than what my Intel notebooks offer from 3y ago FFS! I REALLY HOPR that AMD gets their heads out of their ---es going forward and don't gimp I/O so much for their mobile chipsets AND RETHINKS their low-mid range desktop chipsets as their ridiculously gimped. OK I could take them as ultra low end but not beyond that, but maybe I've been spiled by Intel X and Z range chipsets which are ALL that I used when AMD INSISTED on faildozer...
[EDIT]
AMD's gonna fscked if these clown suppliers continue their half---edly support for threadripper and MORE IMPORTANTLY epyc... we're WAY past the point where this crap should still be happening as CLEARLY the CPUs are stable but the half---ed support is killing it
[/EDIT]
[EDIT2]
REGRESSED to 2.20 BIOS SAME SETTINGsS(BIOS) SAME game NO PROBLEMS. 2.30 BIOS SHOULD BE an ALPHA release as it offers NOTHING other than INSTABILITY and INEXPLICABLE temperature SPIKES.
EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTED with these lowend chipsets which TBH is what they are given the I/O paucity v. intel notebooks that have MORE i/O. Someone at AMD needs to have their head examined or at least removed from their --- IMNHO.
It's more than enough to make me leery of epyc given the poor chipset and ancillary support...
[/EDIT2]
Edited by cutterjohn - 1 hour 46 minutes ago at 9:50am
Subject: X370 Fatal1ty Gaming Professional - [BIOS v2.x]
Posted: 20 May 2017 at 8:48am
You're right something is NOT RIGHT with 2.30 BIOS. I just got a WHEA w/a NOT VERY DEMANDING GAME AND I have noticed in hwinfo 551 latest beta inexplicable temperature spikes on the CPU which I'm going to guess are related to the WHEA.
I'm REALLY REGRETTING NOT waiting for a C6H as VRMs aren't a thing so much for Ryzen... and... I'm regretting NOT waiting for naple/'epyc' since I'm going there anyways given the craptacular low-mid range I/O... yeah SOME people MIGHT be OK w/the low-mid range chipsets, but TBH it's less than what my Intel notebooks offer from 3y ago FFS! I REALLY HOPR that AMD gets their heads out of their ---es going forward and don't gimp I/O so much for their mobile chipsets AND RETHINKS their low-mid range desktop chipsets as their ridiculously gimped. OK I could take them as ultra low end but not beyond that, but maybe I've been spiled by Intel X and Z range chipsets which are ALL that I used when AMD INSISTED on faildozer...
[EDIT]
AMD's gonna fscked if these clown suppliers continue their half---edly support for threadripper and MORE IMPORTANTLY epyc... we're WAY past the point where this crap should still be happening as CLEARLY the CPUs are stable but the half---ed support is killing it
[/EDIT]
[EDIT2]
REGRESSED to 2.20 BIOS SAME SETTINGsS(BIOS) SAME game NO PROBLEMS. 2.30 BIOS SHOULD BE an ALPHA release as it offers NOTHING other than INSTABILITY and INEXPLICABLE temperature SPIKES.
EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTED with these lowend chipsets which TBH is what they are given the I/O paucity v. intel notebooks that have MORE i/O. Someone at AMD needs to have their head examined or at least removed from their --- IMNHO.
It's more than enough to make me leery of epyc given the poor chipset and ancillary support...
[/EDIT2]
Edited by cutterjohn - 1 hour 46 minutes ago at 9:50am